Vaccinations stalling in Germany as people shun AstraZeneca jab

Vaccinations stalling in Germany as people shun AstraZeneca jab

Vaccinations stalling in Germany as people shun AstraZeneca jab

Vaccines against COVID-19 are in short supply in Germany at the moment - but not all vaccines are created equal. In fact, reports have surfaced this week of huge quantities of the AstraZeneca jab lying unused, as patients shun the vaccine in favour of other options. 

Coronavirus vaccine doses going unused

The AstraZeneca vaccine is suffering from a reputation problem in Germany. On Wednesday, the state government of North Rhine-Westphalia told SPIEGEL that they had seen a number of “concerning” indications that the population’s “willingness to vaccinate, in reference to AstraZeneca, has so far been subdued.” 

Vaccination progress is not only stalling in North Rhine-Westphalia. The Minister of Health in Saarland, Monika Bachmann, this week criticised the fact that 54 percent of 200 people who had been signed up for a vaccination failed to show up to their appointments this weekend. 

The RBB has also reported that, of the 30.000 doses that arrived in Berlin last week, only just under 1.000 had been used, while thousands of vaccination appointments were remaining unfilled. In the capital, everyone has the freedom to choose which vaccine they receive, and so uptake among doctors and nurses is apparently low. 

AstraZeneca’s bad reputation in Germany

So what’s driving this hesitant uptake? Firstly, the vaccine proved to be slightly less effective than the BionTech / Pfizer and Moderna candidates in clinical trials. A number of reports have also cast doubt on the vaccine’s efficacy among older people - prompting Germany to only approve the jab for use on patients under the age of 65 - although this move has been fiercely criticised by the vaccine’s manufacturer. 

While the vaccine has proven to be effective against the B.1.1.7 strain of the virus, first discovered in the UK, there is also some suggestion that it offers less protection against the “South African” variant. However, some have pointed to limitations in the latter study. 

Another factor potentially driving the low uptake of the jab is a number of reports of people experiencing severe side-effects after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine. At an ambulance service in Dortmund, around a quarter of employees called in sick after receiving the vaccination. Several hospitals in Lower Saxony have also temporarily suspended vaccinating staff after an unusually large number had strong reactions to the jab. 

The Paul Ehrlich Institute, Germany’s responsible body for vaccine control checks, is currently investigating whether the reported side effects go beyond what was observed in clinical trials. A report is expected to be released this week. 

German scientists & Politicians defend vaccine

In an attempt to counteract this bad reputation, the NRW Ministry of Health released a statement this week, urging people not to treat the AstraZeneca jab as a “second-class vaccine.” “It shows good effectiveness,” the ministry said, pointing out that the side effects are a sign that the body is having the desired response. They also emphasised that, due to “limited vaccination quantities… unfortunately there is not yet the opportunity for everybody to choose their own vaccine.” 

However, the chairperson of the World Medical Association, Frank Ulrich Montgomery, argued that no one should be forced to accept the AstraZeneca vaccine if they would prefer a different jab. “The lower effectiveness cannot be discussed away,” he said. 

Others have responded angrily to Montogomery’s comments. SPD Health Expert Karl Lauterbach described the “call to boycott” as “completely irresponsible”. Lauterbach, who is himself qualified as a doctor, said he would be helping out with vaccinations from the end of February and that “the whole team, including myself, will be vaccinated with the Astra vaccine. We trust it.” 

The virologist Christian Drosten also considers the fundamental concerns about the AstraZeneca vaccine to be unfounded, and said that discussions about it contained a lot of misunderstandings. He said there was no reason not to use the “very good” vaccine in Germany, and urged people not to look at isolated issues through a magnifying glass. 



Abi Carter

Abi studied History & German at the University of Manchester. She has since worked as a writer, editor and content marketeer, but still has a soft spot for museums, castles...

Read more



Leave a comment

ZiggyStardust2 20:38 | 25 February 2021

The AstraZeneca vaccine isn't just "slightly less effective" than the mRNA vaccines, it is ~8-times less effective in preventing COVID: among those participating in the clinical trials of the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), for every 20 placebo-receiving people who got ill with COVID only 1 vaccine-receiving person got ill. In contrast, in the AstraZeneca trial, for every 20 placebo-receiving people who got ill with COVID, 8 vaccine-receiving people got ill with it. So, AstraZeneca vaccine's reputation problem is not an issue of PR, it's an issue of science: their vaccine is MUCH less effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19. Moreover: while the clinical trials for the Pfizer/BioNTech and the Moderna vaccines were designed/executed well, the design/execution of the AstraZeneca trials was a total mess. In my opinion, the reason EU politicians and even EU scientists try so hard to claim - and, in fact, sort of lie - that the AstraZeneca vaccine is just as good as the other ones is simple: there are very few vaccines per capita in Europe, and a significant proportion of those that currently exist are from AstraZeneca. I wish, however, that instead of lying to the public, they'd simply say: "while the AstraZeneca vaccine is much less effective than the mRNA vaccines, it is nevertheless effective and safe, and it is what we currently have".